Downey Beat reported that SCAG has completed work on an initial executive study of alternative routes, and LA Curbed has additional information. Links to the documents and proposed maps are available on both sites.

SCAG estimates that up to 80,000 people a day would ride the line if built, and that since much of the line would be on a dedicated route and not city streets that it would only take a little over an hour to travel from end to end.

Some cities support the idea, some oppose it, and of course cost is an issue. A basic light rail line would cost about $3 billion to build, and some of the jurisdictions are holding out for a magnetic levitation (MagLev) train that would be quieter and cheaper to operate, but would cost a staggering $7 billion to build.

After quoting BIASC CEO David Shepherd (here's the full press release) reporter Kevin Smith writes the following:

With fees and requirements add­ing so much additional cost to each home, builders often can’t make enough profit to move forward with projects.

“I’ve seen that with William Lyon Homes and Shea Homes,” said Zak Bushey, a Realtor with Southland Properties in Glendora. “They had to put projects on hold after they started building.”

BIASC also was quoted in today's LA Daily News column by Greg Wilcox, who writes about the transfer of the Construction Industry Research Board from BIASC to the California Homebuilding Foundation in Sacramento. The column also reveals the service's new name - the Construction Industry Research Bureau. As CHF Executive Director Terri Brunson explains, CIRB is a name people in the industry know. The article has not yet been posted online.

 The housing market continued its painfully slow crawl back toward normalcy last month. You can see it in the fading role of foreclosures, the uptick in median prices here and there and the higher levels of sales in coastal counties.

 Based on all the numbers and where we are going now, a bottom has been reached. We are getting enough activity that it is causing prices to slowly rise.

A developer wants to build a 399-unit apartment complex with ground-floor retail on Sepulveda Boulevard just north of Ventura Boulevard in Sherman Oaks. More exactly, the vacant lot hugs the intersection of the Ventura and San Diego freeways.

But while a neighborhood council somewhat hesitantly endorsed the plan on Monday, the influential local homeowners' association fervently opposes it - and the City Council member who thanks to redistricting now represents the area thinks it's a "little big."

We'll have to wait and see how this oft-repeated dance turns out.

Reporter Greg Wilcox cites an example: A real estate agenct recently had a listing in Tarzana priced under the market at $599,000 and held a broker's open house, used to introduce other agents to the property, on a Friday morning. More than 200 people showed up and the property attracted multiple offers. It's now in escrow for $715,000.

Why the bidding wars? Simple. There aren't many homes for sale, Wilcox notes:

At the end of March there were just 1,875 houses and condos for sale in the San Fernando Valley, according to the Van Nuys-based Southland Regional Association of Realtors, a scant 2.8 month supply at the current sales pace. That's the lowest since the start of the downturn in 2007.

While there are still obstacles out there, it would appear the market is turning.

You can read the joint CHF-BIASC press release here and our initial blog post here.

A side courtyard (front) flows into the great room and then into the back yard in one Lambert Ranch floor plan.

Even more importantly, company officials said more than 3,000 people toured the models over the weekend during its official grand opening.

The company is building 169 homes in three distinct types ranging from 2,730 to 4,876 square feet. The homes incorporate two of the hottest trends in Southern California homebuilding – multigenerational housing opportunities and floor plans that carefully integrate indoor and outdoor living spaces. Options range from dual master suites to a floor plan with separate entrances to the ultimate concept – a two-home family compound.

At the event, sponsored by BIASC’s Orange County Chapter, builders from throughout the region toured the model homes and carefully inspected designs, amenities and materials.

The New Home Company was founded by former executives from John Laing Homes and the Irvine Company – Larry Webb, Joseph Davis, Tom Redwitz and Wayne Stelmar – and is developing communities in Orange County and Northern California.

Low home values paired with extraordinarily low mortgage rates should serve as a signal to consumers that now is a good time to buy. As more home buyers get off the fence, home sales, both existing and new, will continue increasing and help stabilize home prices in the long run.

You can read the Zillow report here and the LA Times Money & Co. post here.

***

There's been a lot of good news on the housing front this week. Economist Mark Zandy declared that "the crash is over." And Dr. Doom himself, economist Christopher Thornberg, said "the recovery is here."

And then in today's Wall Street Journal (sub. req'd), comes this headline: Stunned Home Buyers Find the Bidding Wars Are Back. And as reporter Nick Timiraos reported, it's a simple matter of supply and demand.

From California to Florida, many buyers are increasingly competing for the same house. Unlike the bidding wars that typified the go-go years and largely reflected surging sales, today's are a result of supply shortages.

The article also notes that the declining inventory of older homes is spurring sales of new homes. New home sales are up 16% so far this year, compared with a year ago, while inventories of new homes fell in March to their lowest level since record keeping began in 1963.

Earlier in the week, several public homebuilders reported that sales were up during the first quarter.

All in all, it's been a pretty good week.

Alejandro Lazo reports in the LA Times Money & Co. blog today that rents in Los Angeles County are expected to soar by 7.9 percent over the next year, and rents are climbing throughout the rest of the region as well.

Lazo writes that the forecast, by the university’s Lusk Center for Real Estate, showed rents last year rose in 39 of the submarkets the report tracks in the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, Riverside and San Bernardino.

That across-the-board increase is a change from 2010 when 26 markets showed flat or increasing rents and a big turnaround from 2009 when only three submarkets saw rents rising. Rents are expected to rise throughout the region over the next two years.

During the past year, rents jumped by 6.2 percent in LA County, by 3.4 percent in the Inland Empire and by 3.2 percent in Orange County.

Today's report builds on the Trulia.com survey last month that showed it was now cheaper to buy than to rent in 98 of the nation's top 100 metro areas. 

In a piece in the influential online pub CityWatch, Ed Braddy dissects survey data compiled by the National Association of Realtors last year on housing preferences. The findings reflect the results of studies done in Southern California.

In the internal data of the 2011 Community Preference Survey commissioned by the National Association of Realtors, 52 percent of respondents said, if given a choice, they would prefer to live in traditional suburbs, small towns or the rural countryside. Another 28 percent chose a suburban setting that allowed for some mixed uses. Only 8 percent of the respondents favored a central city environment.

As for vibrant urbanism, only 7 percent were “very interested” in living in a place “at the center of it all.” Most people wanted to live “away from it all." An astonishing 87 percent said “privacy from neighbors” was important to them in deciding where to live.

When presented with a range of housing choices, 80 percent preferred the “single-family detached house.” Only 8 percent chose an apartment or condominium. Furthermore, 61 percent preferred a place where “houses are built far apart on larger lots and you have to drive to get to schools, stores, and restaurants” over 37 percent who wanted a place where “houses are built close together on small lots and it is easy to walk to schools, stores and restaurants.”

So -- absent the loaded terms and buzzwords that are central to Smart Growth -- a large majority of randomly selected people from across the country showed a strong preference for the land use pattern derisively referred to as “sprawl.”

Ironically, based on one loaded question in the survey, Braddy notes that the Realtors' press release said the poll showed most people liked "smart growth." We think some people want to live in high-density neighborhoods and housing opportunities there should be encouraged. But we also think a lot more people will ultimately want to live in a home in the suburbs, and that kind of housing should be encouraged as well.